Women's Charged Assert 11 Running Shoes
- 5.5
- 3.5
- 6
- 4
- 6.5
- 4.5
Check before choosing: Firm underfoot feel on asphalt
Under Armour has 6 researched listings in our catalogue across 1 category; the highest scoring is Women's Charged Assert 11 Running Shoes. Figures below are computed only from these listings, which are research reviews of published product information, not hands-on tests.
Buyer ratings combine 113,535 captured Amazon ratings.

Priced well below average category norms, this shoe offers basic road utility for fitness runners. The traditional EVA-based midsole necessitates alternating with another pair to let the foam expand between sessions. Check the heel-to-toe drop to verify alignment with your lower-leg tolerances.

An iterative update to an entry-level road shoe, retaining a traditional geometry and dense underfoot feel. It serves adequately as an inexpensive second pair to rotate while primary running midsoles decompress. Stack height and overall weight remain firmly positioned in the recreational jogging tier.

A straightforward recreational shoe built with a standard high heel drop and structured synthetic overlays. The firm midsole gives reasonable support for short outings but offers minimal energy return over longer mileage. Plan to rotate it with another shoe to give the foam adequate recovery time.
| Category | Listings | Avg score |
|---|---|---|
| Running shoes & watches | 6 | 7.4 |
Brand alone does not establish compatibility or quality. These are the recorded distinctions, not specifications shared by every Under Armour product.
Check before choosing: Firm underfoot feel on asphalt
Check before choosing: Midsole compresses quickly over high mileage
Check before choosing: Noticeably firm underfoot ride
Check before choosing: Firm compound limits long-run impact absorption
Check before choosing: Heavier than higher-tier performance trainers
Check before choosing: Stiff midsole lacks high-rebound modern foams

No. 01 — Economical road training and gym sessions
Priced well below average category norms, this shoe offers basic road utility for fitness runners. The traditional EVA-based midsole necessitates alternating with another pair to let the foam expand between sessions. Check the heel-to-toe drop to verify alignment with your lower-leg tolerances.

No. 02 — Secondary rotation pair for easy miles
An iterative update to an entry-level road shoe, retaining a traditional geometry and dense underfoot feel. It serves adequately as an inexpensive second pair to rotate while primary running midsoles decompress. Stack height and overall weight remain firmly positioned in the recreational jogging tier.

No. 03 — Short road runs and general fitness
A straightforward recreational shoe built with a standard high heel drop and structured synthetic overlays. The firm midsole gives reasonable support for short outings but offers minimal energy return over longer mileage. Plan to rotate it with another shoe to give the foam adequate recovery time.

No. 04 — Budget gym sessions and short jogs
Priced around forty-two dollars, this model leans toward general athletic training rather than pure distance running. The midsole prioritizes firm stability over progressive road cushioning, which benefits lateral gym work but limits comfort on long road stretches. Buyers should verify if the heel-to-toe offset aligns with their stride before logging road mileage.

No. 05 — Low-cost everyday road jogs
The eleventh iteration of this model maintains entry-level affordability for low-mileage road runners. The conventional midsole material needs a day off between runs to restore its original volume. Inspect stack height specifications to ensure there is adequate forefoot cushion for your stride.

No. 06 — Short road runs and rotation duty
A reliable entry-level road running model built for short to mid-distance training. The shoe uses a standard stack height and a firmer midsole that resists bottoming out, though energy return is minimal. It provides a cost-effective option to alternate with a softer daily trainer.