Tool
Compare two products
Pick any two products from our reviews and see specifications, price, buyer ratings and our scores in one table.
Recorded evidence
What separates these listings
- Price snapshot
- $16.60 price gap
- Product B has the lower captured price. This excludes delivery and ongoing costs.
- Editorial assessment
- 0.2-point score gap
- Product A has the higher research score, not a measured performance advantage.
- Specification coverage
- 12 of 18 fields shared
- Shared labels have recorded values on both sides; matching labels do not guarantee matching units or test conditions.
Product A
Men's Fresh Foam 520 v9 Running Shoe
- Potential fit
- Entry-level daily road training
- Trade-off to resolve
- Lower-tier foam compound compacts faster than premium EVA
Product B
Women's Charged Assert 11 Running Shoes
- Potential fit
- Economical road training and gym sessions
- Trade-off to resolve
- Firm underfoot feel on asphalt
Side-by-side evidence
18 of 18 recorded specification fields shown
| Side by side |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Buyer rating | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| Price | $63.17 | $46.57 |
| Our score | 7.7/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Ratings count | 4,058 ratings | 1,076 ratings |
| Brand | New Balance | Under Armour |
| Best for | Entry-level daily road training | Economical road training and gym sessions |
| Price accessibility | 9.2/10 | — |
| Size range breadth | 9.0/10 | — |
| Data transparency | 4.5/10 | — |
| Midsole durability | 6.8/10 | — |
| Market reception | 8.8/10 | — |
| Value for money | — | 9.2/10 |
| Biomechanical transparency | — | 3.8/10 |
| Sizing range | — | 8.5/10 |
| Rotation utility | — | 7.4/10 |
| User satisfaction | — | 8.8/10 |
| 7 | 40 | 5 |
| 7.5 | 40.5 | 5.5 |
| 8 | 41.5 | 6 |
| 8.5 | 42 | 6 |
| 9 | 42.5 | 6.5 |
| 9.5 | 43 | 7 |
| 10 | 44 | 7.5 |
| 10.5 | 44.5 | 8 |
| 11 | 45 | 8.5 |
| 11.5 | 45.5 | 9 |
| 12 | 46.5 | 9.5 |
| 12.5 | 47 | 10 |
| 13 | 47.5 | Not recorded |
| 14 | 49 | Not recorded |
| 15 | 50 | Not recorded |
| 5.5 | Not recorded | 3.5 |
| 6 | Not recorded | 4 |
| 6.5 | Not recorded | 4.5 |
| Our verdict | This model offers a dedicated road platform at sixty dollars, providing structured baseline running geometry. Buyers must evaluate the specific stack height and offset relative to their strike pattern rather than relying on foam branding. It works effectively as an affordable secondary shoe to rotate with a primary trainer. | Priced well below average category norms, this shoe offers basic road utility for fitness runners. The traditional EVA-based midsole necessitates alternating with another pair to let the foam expand between sessions. Check the heel-to-toe drop to verify alignment with your lower-leg tolerances. |
| Pros and cons |
|
|
Prices and buyer ratings are captured snapshots. A dash means the detail was not recorded, not that a feature is absent. Editorial scores are research assessments, not laboratory measurements.
Sources and limits
This page summarizes our research reviews of Amazon listings, listed specifications and captured buyer ratings. It is not a hands-on test. Scores are editorial assessments, not measured performance; prices are recorded snapshots and may change. A category can include both main products and accessories, so its overall price range is not the cost of a complete setup.
Most recent product record update: October 3, 2026. Individual records may be older; this is not a verification date for every claim. Prices on this page were read from the listings Nov 8, 2026.
- Amazon listing: Men's Fresh Foam 520 v9 Running Shoe
- Amazon listing: Women's Charged Assert 11 Running Shoes
Amazon links are affiliate links. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.
Comparing within a category?
Our buyer's guides show the full spec ranges and price tiers for a category, which is usually the faster way to narrow a shortlist before comparing two finalists.
Browse every category guide